slightly off topic but JEEP went from verified to flagged in about 21 days which is the fastest ive seen
i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in that
#announcements 2025-03-01
Saturday16 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- tarpit_tam — slightly off topic but JEEP went from verified to flagged in about 21 days which is the fastest ive seen i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in… 16:46
- tarpit_tam — the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result, happy to be corrected 17:01
- egfr_ed — i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening 18:26
- egfr_ed — took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows 18:41
- customs_owl — a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose, ill dig out the number 18:45
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result, happy to be corrected
if you cant find the page, the reference section got reorganised last month
the criteria page is pinned now, it wasnt when the first version went up
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
provisional means one result on file instead of two, nothing more sinister than that
is this about all vendors or only the ones with open results
two grants and one revocation this quarter, which is roughly the usual rate, we shall see
second read helped
does the new channel mean the old one gets closed
status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check
i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening
👀2😂12
took me two reads to get it. the short version is nothing changes for members, only the vendor rows
about time
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose, ill dig out the number
[edited]so thats provisional then