the revocation was about a gap between the certificate and the independent result
#announcements 2025-10-12
Sunday17 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- hot_mailbox — did FGP lose verified status or just get flagged 19:13
- hot_mailbox — sorry to jump in is the redaction policy change retroactive the grant was on a fresh PeptideMeter report, i saw the numbers before this went up 20:58
- hot_mailbox — does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered 21:17
i said this would be a mess and it was fine, so noting that i was wrong
does the criteria change apply to grants already given
[edited]the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result, ymmv
did FGP lose verified status or just get flagged
⚠️2👀10✅4
the announcement about the automated logging pass is the only one that changed how i type
noted, thanks staff
about time
is the pinned study index the same one as the reference page
the digest still lands on mondays, only the format changed
sorry to jump in is the redaction policy change retroactive
the grant was on a fresh PeptideMeter report, i saw the numbers before this went up
🤝14
the new pinned resource is genuinely good, ive used it twice this week already, ask me again in a month
grant well earned
saw the log row
does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered
📈11🎉6🔥5
does the new channel mean the old one gets closed
verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired, n of 1 obviously