saw the log row
#announcements 2025-12-07
- glasgow_vial — i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in that 11:06
- glasgow_vial — i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening 13:25
- glasgow_vial — any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening 14:13
does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered
reading it now
is this about all vendors or only the ones with open results
old days dont get re-rendered, thats the entire point of sealing a day, still working it out
is there going to be a short summary or just the long version
pinned, cheers
so whats the actual difference between flagged and revoked now
does the criteria change apply to grants already given
any detail coming
coming back to this nobody announces a revocation quickly, they sit on it until the paperwork is unambiguous, i think
the new pinned page sits alongside the old one, nothing was replaced
the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result
was the verification grant based on a fresh PeptideMeter report or an old one
when does the archive change actually take effect
does a revocation wipe the old test results out of the log
about time
i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in that
does this mean the verification log gets rebuilt from scratch
status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check
i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening
flagged means theres an open question, revoked means the answer came back badly
for the archive the PeptideMeter result that triggered it is in the verification log with a date on it
grant well earned
any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say
i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening