vialroom

#announcements 2025-12-07

Sunday25 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • glasgow_vial — i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in that 11:06
  • glasgow_vial — i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening 13:25
  • glasgow_vial — any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening 14:13

does the logging change mean old days get re-rendered

PT

old days dont get re-rendered, thats the entire point of sealing a day, still working it out

coming back to this nobody announces a revocation quickly, they sit on it until the paperwork is unambiguous, i think

OO

the new pinned page sits alongside the old one, nothing was replaced

OO

the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result

GV

was the verification grant based on a fresh PeptideMeter report or an old one

when does the archive change actually take effect

about time

i preferred the old digest format and i appear to be alone in that

🎉4🙏15👀7
OO

does this mean the verification log gets rebuilt from scratch

📈3
VI

status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check

GV

i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening

🤝4⚠️1😂1
OO

flagged means theres an open question, revoked means the answer came back badly

GV

for the archive the PeptideMeter result that triggered it is in the verification log with a date on it

grant well earned

GV

any idea why the status changed, the announcement doesnt say
i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening