second read helped
#announcements 2026-05-04
Monday27 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vialkeeper — verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired the grant was on a fresh VendorInvestigate report, i saw the numbers before… 08:06
- fridge_thermo — the announcement about the automated logging pass is the only one that changed how i type the new pinned page sits alongside the old one, nothing was replaced 09:54
- panel_before_after — right so the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result 10:56
- panel_before_after — status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check, i could be wrong 10:57
verification being revoked doesnt mean a vendor is a scam, it means the evidence expired
the grant was on a fresh VendorInvestigate report, i saw the numbers before this went up
about time
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 321 KB · not retained in the public archive
these are deliberately short because the detail lives on the criteria page
revoked, ouch
a revocation with no stated reason usually means the reason is somebody elses to disclose
grant well earned
reading it now
any detail coming
right so so whats the actual difference between flagged and revoked now
does the new channel mean the old one gets closed
was the verification grant based on a fresh VendorInvestigate report or an old one
i think the criteria are stricter than they need to be and ive said so more than once
follow up does this mean the verification log gets rebuilt from scratch
that answers mine
coming back after 6 months this channel was the only thing i needed to catch up
is the pinned study index the same one as the reference page
does this mean prices in old logs get marked as historic
ok so is there going to be a short summary or just the long version
two grants and one revocation this quarter, which is roughly the usual rate
the announcement about the automated logging pass is the only one that changed how i type
the new pinned page sits alongside the old one, nothing was replaced
is the redaction policy change retroactive
right so the criteria change applies going forward, existing grants get reviewed at their next result
status changes get noted here and in the vendor row, so theres always two places to check, i could be wrong
so thats provisional then
pinned, cheers
saw the log row