vialroom
Thread · #announcements · 2026-04-27

i was wrong when i said this was retroactive

Spun off from a message in #announcements on 2026-04-27. 10 messages, 4 participants.

The message this came from
  • willow_waits — i was wrong when i said this was retroactive, it isnt, someone corrected me the same evening the anchors are unchanged and will stay unchanged, because everything the archive links to depends on them 19:54
TT

clarifying yesterdays note nothing about this is retroactive to the vendor pages, which are built from the same logs either way

HL

revocation isnt permanent, it flips back when theres a clean independent result, fortnightly, as it has been

EE

the room announces changes because a change nobody was told about is indistinguishable from an error, on the log with a date

update as promised the verification standard has not changed since 2024. the wording has been tidied twice, timestamps are utc throughout

anchors unchanged

👍1
HL

the counts on the old pages were correct on the date they carried. they are recomputed with the index

WW

reading it again it does say the window is 4 weeks, i just missed it first time