vialroom

#bloodwork 2026-05-11

Monday50 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • tarpit_tam — and for the direction of travel, FLOW is the renal outcome trial and it came out protective 15:09
  • tarpit_tam — correct. one is a population outcome over years, the other is your creatinine on a tuesday 15:22
  • sharps_comedy — two year arc, same lab, all fasting 15:37
  • tarpit_tam — and this is that question answered eighteen months later, which is the only timescale that ever works 16:07

if you only get one thing, get a fasting insulin. it is the one that becomes impossible later

[edited]
HM

if a result frightens you, that is a conversation with a clinician. we will help you read it, we will not tell you it is fine

my potassium came back weird and the retest was normal, whats that about

📉6💀6
FI

apob is the better marker and it is harder to get. i track both because i can only get one reliably

not a chat question

🧪2🔥18🤝11
UU

update from 5 months ago: a1c down, apob unchanged, and i am genuinely annoyed about the apob

tsh moved slightly, is that a known thing
most of the lipid improvement in my panel tracked the weight, not the drug

🎉1⚠️6🧪15
TT

a small early dip is a known haemodynamic pattern with several drug classes. it is not automatically damage

what matters is the slope over a year, not one step

BB

and creatinine moves with muscle mass and hydration. you have just changed both

TT

creatinine-based eGFR is an estimate that assumes an average body. lose 20kg and some of that assumption breaks

💡9
TT

cystatin C based eGFR does not care about muscle. it is not standard everywhere and it costs more

TT

and for the direction of travel, FLOW is the renal outcome trial and it came out protective

Cited study
Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (FLOW)
New England Journal of Medicine · 2024
semaglutide reduced the risk of major kidney disease events versus placebo in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease; the trial was stopped early for efficacy
BB

which does not mean your dip is nothing. it means the dip is not the story

TT

correct. one is a population outcome over years, the other is your creatinine on a tuesday

🎯12
SC

one row per week. weight and waist, and lab columns where i have them

weights-and-labs-2y.csv
1 file · 41 KB · not retained in the public archive
BB

the weekly weight column is what makes the lab rows readable. rate of loss explains half of them

SC

two year arc, same lab, all fasting

              start    m3      m12     m24
HbA1c %        6.4     6.1     5.4     5.3
fasting ins    22      14       6.8     6.1
HOMA-IR        6.1     3.7     1.5     1.3
apoB g/L       1.28    1.19    0.82    0.79
ALT U/L         63      44      21      19
eGFR            92      81      88      90
weight kg      131     121      97      94
🔥21🙌7
TT

it usually does. that is the shape people should expect and almost nobody is shown

VB

archive lookup: two earlier conversations from this member in #bloodwork — 2024-09-14 baseline panel, 2025-01-08 month three follow up. linked to this one.

SC

i asked about that eGFR dip in january last year and got told to wait. that was the right advice

II

different question — my potassium came back high, what do i do

CH

you ring whoever ordered the test. today, not after you have read the archive

a high potassium is not a chat topic and we are not going to guess whether it was a squeezed sample

TT

haemolysis is the most common reason for a spurious one, but the person who can tell you is the one holding your record

II

back — repeat draw was normal. they said the first tube had probably been knocked about

TT

most common answer, and still the right thing to have checked

LN

i pay privately for fasting insulin because nobody will order it for me otherwise

if your glucose is in mg/dL the divisor is 405. if it is mmol/L it is 22.5

LN

the FLOW result is why my nephrologist changed her position on this entirely
get fasting insulin at baseline. you cannot go back and get it once you have started

LN

unrelated but nobody here is reading your bloods as a clinician. we are reading them as people who have had a lot of bloods, for what its worth

my b12 is borderline, supplementing or eating differently

🧊1👍16