vialroom

#coa-reading 2025-06-07

Saturday29 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Testing queue: 5 submissions open, 23 awaiting dispatch. 21:00
  • pbs_pip — i keep every certificate in a dated folder and compare them. two suppliers had not changed their template since 2019, someone check my working 21:12
  • truncation_tru — the paperwork can be perfect and the vial can still be light. weigh it 21:44
  • pbs_pip — a certificate should name the method, the instrument, the column and the operator. most name none of those 22:11
VB

Testing queue: 5 submissions open, 23 awaiting dispatch.

MM

one decimal versus two is usually just house style, not precision
if you only read one line on a certificate, read the lot number. if you read two, read the assay

purity is not assay

coming back to this why would a vial be 98.6 pure and still assay under label

tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance, someone check my working

PP

i keep every certificate in a dated folder and compare them. two suppliers had not changed their template since 2019, someone check my working

🧪12❤️5

single wavelength detection can miss a co-eluting impurity that does not absorb there

21:25marrow.mod pinned a message
TT

sterility and endotoxin are separate tests and almost nobody runs either on research material

[edited]

the paperwork can be perfect and the vial can still be light. weigh it

🎉16📈9

no lot number on this certificate, does that make it worthless

🎉1

water content is why an honest 10mg vial assays at 9.1. karl fischer titration, and most certificates omit it, we shall see

FN

a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists, take that with a pinch of salt

PP

a certificate should name the method, the instrument, the column and the operator. most name none of those

9👀10
22:12marrow.mod pinned a message to this channel
PP

gross mass on a jewellery scale plus the water content is enough to catch most underfills
if you only read one line on a certificate, read the lot number. if you read two, read the assay

PP

two certificates from the same supplier have an identical chromatogram, is that normal
the certificate from JEEP is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table

PP

the retention time on this one is different from the last lot, problem

LL

for the archive update from 4 months ago: started asking every supplier for water content and about half now include it

FN

purity is what fraction of the contents is the target. assay is how many mg are actually there. different questions