one decimal versus two is usually just house style, not precision, ill dig out the number
#coa-reading 2026-01-04
- VialBot — Assay note: HJ lot A-2418 reported at 99% of label content. 20:33
- back_from_away — net peptide is gross mass minus water minus counterion. that is why 11.4mg of powder can be a correct 10mg vial 20:48
- back_from_away — a vial can be 99.4% pure and hold 8.1mg of a 10mg label. both numbers are true and only one of them is the one you care about 21:03
- back_from_away — the certificate from SSA is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table 21:53
- VialBot — Reminder for back_from_away: dose day is today. Set 5 days ago. 21:54
Assay note: HJ lot A-2418 reported at 99% of label content.
net peptide is gross mass minus water minus counterion. that is why 11.4mg of powder can be a correct 10mg vial
a vial can be 99.4% pure and hold 8.1mg of a 10mg label. both numbers are true and only one of them is the one you care about
the paperwork can be perfect and the vial can still be light. weigh it, thats just me
if the certificate date precedes the lot date, ask. sometimes it is sloppiness and sometimes it is not
should a certificate say which instrument and method they used
check the lot
the honest summary is that a certificate tells you what the supplier says about a lot they chose to test
the certificate from SSA is the one i use to teach this because it actually has a populated impurity table
Reminder for back_from_away: dose day is today. Set 5 days ago.
two certificates from the same supplier have an identical chromatogram, is that normal
coming back after 26 months, has the pinned reading guide changed
single wavelength detection can miss a co-eluting impurity that does not absorb there
is water content normally on a certificate or do you have to ask