retention time shifts between runs are normal. relative retention time is the number to compare
#coa-reading 2026-01-23
- VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot B-0114. Nothing logged either way. 04:36
- is_this_forever — i asked JEEP for the method and they sent it. that alone put them ahead of most 05:16
- peak_split — gross mass on a jewellery scale plus the water content is enough to catch most underfills 10:31
- ten_of_ten — is endotoxin ever tested on research material 10:35
net not gross
Purity check: no report on file for lot B-0114. Nothing logged either way.
not detected means nothing
no lot no certificate
update from 1 months ago: started asking every supplier for water content and about half now include it
is area percent the same thing as how many mg are in the vial
i asked JEEP for the method and they sent it. that alone put them ahead of most
why do some certificates report to one decimal and some to two
nobody can authenticate a certificate from a scan. you authenticate the material by testing it yourself
why would a vial be 99 pure and still assay under label
residual solvents matter more than people think for anything that went through a lot of purification steps
genuine question should a certificate say which instrument and method they used
same chromatogram
tfa counterion runs higher by mass than acetate. if the certificate does not say, you cannot do the mass balance
a vial can be 99.4% pure and hold 8.1mg of a 10mg label. both numbers are true and only one of them is the one you care about
no lot number, no certificate. a document you cannot tie to the vial in your hand is decoration
the paperwork can be perfect and the vial can still be light. weigh it
purity is not assay
follow up water content is why an honest 10mg vial assays at 9.1. karl fischer titration, and most certificates omit it
sterility and endotoxin are separate tests and almost nobody runs either on research material
[edited]single wavelength detection can miss a co-eluting impurity that does not absorb there, still working it out
unrelated but the related substances table is the interesting part. a row of "not detected" means they did not look hard
looks re-dated
ok so a lab that reports "greater than 98%" rather than a number is telling you they did not integrate carefully
i have never seen a research certificate with an endotoxin result on it. not once
a certificate should name the method, the instrument, the column and the operator. most name none of those, still working it out
good certificate actually
thats a tell
one decimal versus two is usually just house style, not precision
is sterility tested as part of a normal purity certificate
test it yourself
gross mass on a jewellery scale plus the water content is enough to catch most underfills
the three way match is vial, certificate, invoice. if all three agree you have something
not evidence on its own
weigh the vial
is endotoxin ever tested on research material
sorry to jump in net peptide is gross mass minus water minus counterion. that is why 11.4mg of powder can be a correct 10mg vial
ask for water content
purity is what fraction of the contents is the target. assay is how many mg are actually there. different questions
if you only read one line on a certificate, read the lot number. if you read two, read the assay
the font on this one changes halfway down, am i being paranoid
tfa or acetate, how do i tell from the paperwork