vialroom

#coa-reading 2026-05-01

Friday21 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • karl_fischer — no lot number, no certificate. a document you cannot tie to the vial in your hand is decoration, take that with a pinch of salt 22:19
  • HPLC_Hank — why do some certificates report to one decimal and some to two a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the… 22:49
  • HPLC_Hank — quick one i was wrong about this for a year: area percent under-reports nothing, it just answers a different question than assay does 22:50
  • plus_sixteen — retention time shifts between runs are normal. relative retention time is the number to compare 22:51
KF

the related substances table is the interesting part. a row of "not detected" means they did not look hard

is there a standard layout or does every lab do their own

KF

if the certificate date precedes the lot date, ask. sometimes it is sloppiness and sometimes it is not

*PeptideMeter not the other one

no lot number, no certificate. a document you cannot tie to the vial in your hand is decoration, take that with a pinch of salt

the three way match is vial, certificate, invoice. if all three agree you have something

KF

how do you verify a certificate is actually from the lab it says

[edited]
HH

why do some certificates report to one decimal and some to two
a supplier certificate on its own is a starting point, not evidence. that is the whole reason the verification channel exists

quick one i was wrong about this for a year: area percent under-reports nothing, it just answers a different question than assay does

PS

retention time shifts between runs are normal. relative retention time is the number to compare

🙏14
HH

should a certificate say which instrument and method they used

thats the counterion

slightly off topic but tfa or acetate, how do i tell from the paperwork

❤️1