vialroom

#dosing-titration 2024-05-02

Thursday24 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • noct.titrate — if it "stopped working after four days" that is almost never pharmacokinetics, take that with a pinch of salt 18:28
  • mg_per_ml — i jumped a rung once to catch up after a supply gap and it was a bad week. would not repeat the people who do best here are almost always the ones going slowest 18:43
  • VialBot — Recon calculator: 10mg in 3ml = 10mg/ml. 18:45
  • VialBot — Assay note: CPC lot H-2814 reported at 96.8% of label content. 19:12
MP

i drifted from sunday to wednesday over a year and only noticed when i checked the log

NT

if it "stopped working after four days" that is almost never pharmacokinetics, take that with a pinch of salt

MP

i jumped a rung once to catch up after a supply gap and it was a bad week. would not repeat
the people who do best here are almost always the ones going slowest

NT

holding is not failing. most people here who lasted two years held at least one dose for months

PM

if the current dose is still working, going up is spending headroom you might want later, i think

[edited]
NT

anyone tracked whether a smaller more frequent dose changed their side effects

if you are asking whether to go up, the fact you are asking usually means not yet

go slower

PM

if you are going up because the scale stalled for two weeks, wait. two weeks is noise

two weeks is nothing

📈4⚠️2
VB

Assay note: CPC lot H-2814 reported at 96.8% of label content.

🎉1
VL

i hold for two months minimum before i decide a dose has stopped doing anything

NT

my titration ladder took 17 months to climb and i would do it slower again

i have been at 12 for 15 months and honestly i have stopped wanting to move

quick one whats your rule for when a side effect means hold rather than push

came down, no regrets

VL

if i took it 8 days late do i shift the schedule or go back to the old day

the trials escalated on a fixed schedule because a trial has to. you are not a trial