the trials escalated on a fixed schedule because a trial has to. you are not a trial
#dosing-titration 2024-05-11
- chlorhex — the trials escalated on a fixed schedule because a trial has to. you are not a trial 21:05
- chlorhex — update question: did anyone who held for 21 months regret it plateau versus set point is not answerable in under six months of data 21:20
- gradient_greg — small steps are better than big ones and the only reason people take big ones is impatience 21:34
- VialBot — Batch lookup E-2205: 6 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-01-01. 21:38
update question: did anyone who held for 21 months regret it
plateau versus set point is not answerable in under six months of data
what does the room think about jumping a rung to catch up
small steps are better than big ones and the only reason people take big ones is impatience
Batch lookup E-2205: 6 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-01-01.
i hold for two months minimum before i decide a dose has stopped doing anything
the ladder in the trials is a starting point, not a schedule you owe anyone
came down from a treatment dose to maintenance over about three months and it was uneventful
if you are going up because the scale stalled for two weeks, wait. two weeks is noise, ill dig out the number
update from 11 months ago: held at the same dose the whole time and still losing slowly
after a gap of more than about three weeks i restart one rung lower. thats my own rule, not advice
the argument for splitting is a flatter curve. the argument against is you have doubled your injections for a guess