thats co-elution
#hplc-massspec 2025-02-20
- vacuum_vic — does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is 18:54
- gradient_greg — slightly off topic but relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not 19:23
- monoisotopic — follow up if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic, we shall see 19:53
- monoisotopic — i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer 21:08
- salt_bridge — genuine question if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result 21:14
does ms/ms actually prove identity or just make it very likely
has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
can you tell a dimer from the chromatogram alone
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much
slightly off topic but baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column
does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
plus sixteen, is that always oxidation
my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean
slightly off topic but relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks
ms/ms or it isnt identity
a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see
update from 2 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything
follow up if the number you are staring at is a third of what you expected, do the charge state arithmetic before you panic, we shall see
oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan
i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column
integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance
plus 16 is oxidation
integration difference
a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information
retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer
need more sample
i asked Medutest for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question
*that should say weekly
genuine question if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result
*PeptideMeter not the other one