is a tailing factor of anything specific a problem
i asked VendorInvestigate for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question
#hplc-massspec 2025-05-04
- week_three_wall — while im here relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not, happy to be corrected 15:00
- area_percent — tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5 the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something… 16:17
- HPLC_Hank — deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant 17:09
- HPLC_Hank — two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly 17:48
- VialBot — Batch lookup G-0641: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-08-02. 17:50
a warm transit can put a visible degradant peak on a chromatogram. that is what 13 days at ambient does
right so how do you tell co-elution from a clean single peak
right so retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily, for what its worth
while im here relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not, happy to be corrected
my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean
nobody runs enough blanks, including me
a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information
plus sixteen, is that always oxidation
do the arithmetic
*Medutest not the other one
thats co-elution
[edited]how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity
tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5
the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much
monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting
run a blank
why do two labs integrate the same peak differently
does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant
integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance, still working it out
two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly
Batch lookup G-0641: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-08-02.
baseline is drifting badly, is that the column or the mobile phase
semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2