i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column
#hplc-massspec 2025-08-17
- two_ml_two — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column 18:05
- VialBot — New independent result logged — SWB, lot F-1330, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter). 18:53
- VialBot — Reminder for two_ml_two: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago. 19:43
- monoisotopic — baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column, take that with a pinch of salt 20:20
tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5
ask for the trace
plus 16 is oxidation
New independent result logged — SWB, lot F-1330, purity 97.4% (PeptideMeter).
deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant
how do you spot a deletion in a sequence from mass alone
Reminder for two_ml_two: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago.
show me the spectrum
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer, ymmv
has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong
thats the solvent peak
if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks
baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column, take that with a pinch of salt
update from 17 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything
214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics
retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily