vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2025-11-08

Saturday31 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • no_appetite_nia — if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result, from memory 16:35
  • VialBot — Recon calculator: 20mg in 1ml = 2mg/ml. 16:38
  • zoya_zeros — why does integration change the number so much 17:38
  • no_appetite_nia — two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly 19:49
NA

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result, from memory

PS

does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

need more sample

right so baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column

the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

within inter-lab range

🎉1🧊15😂1
SB

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

ZZ

i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state

SB

genuine question can you tell a dimer from the chromatogram alone

[edited]
ZZ

slightly off topic but how would a truncation sequence show up

run a blank

[edited]

why does integration change the number so much

🧊11🤝5😂7
ZZ

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

BR

a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks

*Medutest not the other one

show me the spectrum

BR

why do two labs integrate the same peak differently

NA

i asked Medutest for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

NA

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient

you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it

coming back after 16 months, what changed in how you read these