vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-03-01

Sunday25 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • no_appetite_nia — a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information 13:34
  • no_appetite_nia — co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding, i think 13:35
  • fasting_insulin — how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity 15:15
AO

update from 10 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything, for what its worth

AO

shallow gradients hide related substances behind the main peak. a steeper one separates and looks worse, honestly

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result

DE

truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which

a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information

👀1517🔥3

co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding, i think

🧪113📈12
FI

genuine question has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong

is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates

peptidemeter-summary-f-1330.pdf
2 pages · 727 KB · not retained in the public archive

how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity

❤️3📈13💀5
FI

unrelated but i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

LM

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks

LM

while im here oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan

the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent

FI

semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2

LM

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly