vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-03-11

Wednesday30 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • monoisotopic — is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides 20:12
  • aliquot_ada — you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it 20:39
  • factory_direct_fi — coming back after 23 months, what changed in how you read these 21:38
AA

you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it

🧪13🧊5

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics

👀6🎉7
RR

tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da, so 2+ is near 2407.8 and 3+ near 1605.5, i could be wrong

FA

slightly off topic but is there any point running a blank if the sample is the question

🤝1😂2
FD

does retention time on its own tell you what the compound is
two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

RR

a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you

update on the earlier thing update from 19 months ago: switched to asking for the chromatogram rather than the number and it changed everything

GG

sorry to jump in the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much

AP

shallow gradients hide related substances behind the main peak. a steeper one separates and looks worse, honestly

AP

semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2

1👍2📈4

how would a truncation sequence show up