vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-04-18

Saturday26 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • gus_charts — truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which 22:58
  • fridge_thermo — 214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, n of 1 obviously 23:12
  • nine_nine_one — do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient 23:46
  • fridge_thermo — whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size 23:58
GC

truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which

💀3👀8👍12

thats the solvent peak

shallow gradient

🤝11

deamidation is about plus 0.98 Da. it is not a rounding error, it is a degradant

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

how much sample does a lab actually need for identity as well as purity

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, n of 1 obviously

🧪1📈17❤️16

ms/ms or it isnt identity

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result, still working it out

HH

while im here a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you

integration choices move the number by a few tenths easily. that is most of your inter-lab variance

KF

coming back to this nobody runs enough blanks, including me, ill dig out the number

oxidation is about plus 15.99 Da and is usually methionine or tryptophan, happy to be corrected

do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient

🔥1❤️9⚠️12
FT

whats a normal gradient for a peptide this size

medutest-report-e-2205.pdf
3 pages · 191 KB · not retained in the public archive