vialroom

#hplc-massspec 2026-05-02

Saturday59 messages14 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • rotterdam_recon — co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding 16:17
  • VialBot — Reminder for thistle_tests: dose day is today. Set 9 days ago. 16:42
  • HPLC_Hank — i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column, we shall see 17:36
  • deamidation — a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you 18:37
  • monoisotopic — is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates 21:18
MO

baseline drift on a gradient is normal. baseline drift on an isocratic hold is your column

LU

214nm sees the amide backbone so it sees everything. 280 only sees aromatics, thats just me

II

my peak has a shoulder on it, what does that usually mean

[edited]

a shoulder on a peak is information, and usually bad information, still working it out

i asked PeptideMeter for the raw trace and they sent it. that is the right answer to that question

has anyone ever had a result where the mass was right and the purity was wrong

VV

truncations show as a mass deficit matching one or more residues. you need the sequence to say which

RR

if the lab reports area percent without stating the wavelength, the number is less useful than it looks

VV

you need more sample for identity than for purity. plan for that when you post it, anyway

the first peak is the solvent. it is always the solvent

co-elution is the failure mode that a beautiful single peak is most likely to be hiding

❤️2👍1

why does integration change the number so much

is uv at 214 or 280 better for peptides

TT

i have a number at about a third of what i expected, is that a charge state

TP

ms/ms sequencing is the only thing i would call identity. everything else is circumstantial

VB

Reminder for thistle_tests: dose day is today. Set 9 days ago.

LN

shallow gradients hide related substances behind the main peak. a steeper one separates and looks worse, honestly

VV

a certificate with a number and no chromatogram is asking you to trust the integration you cannot see

ms/ms or it isnt identity

HH

i was wrong about tailing factor. it is usually the injection or the pH, not the column, we shall see

⚠️2🔥12
VV

relative retention time against a standard is comparable between labs. absolute minutes are not

MO

two labs a point or two apart on the same lot is normal and gets mistaken for one of them being wrong constantly

need more sample

📈12⚠️1

do you trust an area percent from a shallow gradient

retention time is a hint, not a fingerprint. two different peptides can co-elute perfectly happily

DE

a dimer usually shows up late and at roughly double the mass. the chromatogram alone will not tell you

💀2
RS

semaglutide is about 4113.6 Da. [M+2H]2+ lands near 2057.8, [M+3H]3+ near 1372.2

is a tailing factor of anything specific a problem

nobody runs enough blanks, including me, anyway

RS

if somebody says they ran a mass spec and does not show you a spectrum, that is a claim, not a result

MO

the honest position is that hobby-level interpretation of a chromatogram is worth something but not much

MO

is monoisotopic or average mass the one on most certificates

17🧪2📉4
II

i have had a lot where the mass was exactly right and the purity was 96.8. wrong question, right answer

MG

monoisotopic and average diverge more the bigger the molecule. say which one you are quoting