vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-04-06

Sunday30 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Batch lookup F-1330: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-06-14. 10:46
  • HPLC_Hank — quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not 13:13
  • swab_dry_first — what compound should we prioritise for the next round 13:53
  • bench_notes — coming back after 12 months, is the submission process the same 14:54
NN

roughly one sample in 3 rounds has gone missing in transit. budget for it emotionally

VB

Batch lookup F-1330: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-06-14.

send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it

send powder

HH

how many people do we need before the split is worth it
quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not

[edited]
HH

quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not

📉4
SD

PeptideMeter has been the fastest for us. Janoshik has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab

two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like

1

what compound should we prioritise for the next round

📉11
SD

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement

we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see

coming back after 12 months, is the submission process the same

👍11🤝7👀8
HH

are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source

BN

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup

MC

do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt

blinded obviously

SD

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control