we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice
code compound submitted status
R-01 semaglutide 2026-02-14 reported
R-02 tirzepatide 2026-02-14 reported
R-03 retatrutide 2026-02-16 in queue
R-04 reference std 2026-02-16 reportedhow do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
thats the turnaround
do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt, someone check my working
two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like
Digest for the week of 2025-08-17 has been published.
send powder
a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement
a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial
whats the current turnaround, last one took 23 days
publish the raw
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control, ymmv
we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see
who is coordinating this round
i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
the split works from about 3 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth
whats the wording on the customs declaration for a sample
code compound submitted status
R-01 semaglutide 2026-02-14 reported
R-02 tirzepatide 2026-02-14 reported
R-03 retatrutide 2026-02-16 in queue
R-04 reference std 2026-02-16 reporteddo you want the vial reconstituted or as powder
chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup
coordinating this round