keep half back
#lab-requests 2025-11-23
- split_the_cost — is there a queue position i can check 19:54
- kev_measures — submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust 21:24
- cold_pack_carla — Janoshik has been the fastest for us. PeptideMeter has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab 21:25
- tail_factor — coming back to this including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process 23:14
how much sample does the lab need for purity plus quantity
i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests
i keep half the sample back so there is something to send if the first one goes missing
do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder
we do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it, thats just me
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control
publish the raw
quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not, n of 1 obviously
is there a queue position i can check
follow up we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice
i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
if you want to know about your vial, you have to submit your vial. that is the whole answer
label the syringe
a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial, happy to be corrected
do not send your only vial. that has happened twice and both times it hurt
turnaround has been between 19 days and twice that depending on the queue
count me in
is there a submission going out this month and can i get in on it
submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust
Janoshik has been the fastest for us. PeptideMeter has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab
thats the turnaround
unrelated but two labs on the same lot is a luxury but it is how we learned what inter-lab variance looks like
send powder
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
while im here a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement
coming back to this including a reference standard in the batch is the single best thing we ever added to this process