vialroom

#lab-requests 2025-12-17

Wednesday22 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • two_three_lifts — how many people do we need before the split is worth it 19:00
  • month_six_me — is it worth including a reference standard in the batch Janoshik has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab 19:19
  • ring_size_down — sorry to jump in what compound should we prioritise for the next round 20:06
MS

i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests

MS

a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement

label the syringe

[edited]

code not name

is it worth including a reference standard in the batch
Janoshik has been the fastest for us. VendorInvestigate has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab

👍5
TT

powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control, for what its worth
we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see

RS

chain of custody in hobby testing is weak and we say so in every writeup, still working it out

blinded obviously

😂2

i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones

PT

submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust