label the syringe
#lab-requests 2026-05-22
Friday31 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- warsaw_vial — coming back to this submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust 12:00
- belfast_bac — declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is 12:40
- seizure_letter — we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice 13:18
- nate_nights — for the archive quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not 15:22
- coa_or_cope — whats the failure rate on samples actually arriving 15:37
blinded obviously
✅10👍8💀1
dont send your only vial
turnaround has been between 23 days and twice that depending on the queue
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
coming back after 7 months, is the submission process the same
the split works from about 6 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth, thats just me
coordinating this round
keep half back
weights-monthly.csv
816 rows · not retained in the public archive
⚠️6
a code and a lot number on the syringe in permanent marker. that is the whole labelling requirement
follow up the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive, ymmv
do you want the vial reconstituted or as powder
coming back to this submissions go out blinded. the lab gets a code, not a supplier name. that removes one variable, it is not distrust
code compound submitted status
R-01 semaglutide 2026-02-14 reported
R-02 tirzepatide 2026-02-14 reported
R-03 retatrutide 2026-02-16 in queue
R-04 reference std 2026-02-16 reportedwe do not help with wording beyond that and the mods are strict about it
count me in
in for one
🤝2❤️14👍4
Medutest has been the fastest for us. Medutest has been the most detailed. those are not the same lab
update from 18 months ago: the blinding process is unchanged and it has held up fine
coa-d-0718.pdf
1 page · 828 KB · not retained in the public archive
declare it as an analytical reference sample with a low value. that is what it is
🎉2🧪5✅12
how are we splitting the cost this time
⚠️9
code not name
we have never had a lab mix up a sample. we have had members mix up their own labelling twice
vial-sg-1177-front.png
900 × 1200 · 161 KB · not retained in the public archive
send powder
code compound submitted status
R-01 semaglutide 2026-02-14 reported
R-02 tirzepatide 2026-02-14 reported
R-03 retatrutide 2026-02-16 in queue
R-04 reference std 2026-02-16 reported🧪4⚠️6🙏7
can i add a second lot to the same submission
we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see
what compound should we prioritise for the next round
👀4💀1
for the archive quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not
🎉13
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
how long do you keep the retained half of the sample
whats the failure rate on samples actually arriving
🤝14👍3👀18
is it worth including a reference standard in the batch