whats the split
#lab-requests 2026-06-19
the split works from about 6 people. below that everyone pays more than the test is worth
label the syringe
slightly off topic but a pooled result tells you about the pool. it does not tell you about your vial, from memory
quantity is the test worth paying for. purity is usually fine and fill usually is not
follow up i would rather fund one careful quantity test than three purity tests
sorry to jump in whats the wording on the customs declaration for a sample
how do we stop the pool telling us about the pool instead of my vial
*PeptideMeter not the other one
blinded obviously
code not name
what happens if a submission gets lost in transit
powder if you can. reconstituted travels worse and adds a variable we cannot control
i coordinate the round, collect the codes, and post every result including the dull ones
the queue is posted and updated. if your code is not on it, it did not arrive
New independent result logged — QYB, lot G-0641, purity 98.1% (PeptideMeter).
we publish the raw report. summaries hide the thing you needed to see
send a capped syringe with enough for a rerun. the minimum is never enough if they need to repeat it, n of 1 obviously
are we blinding this one or does the lab know the source
add a standard