one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
#other-peptides 2024-07-08
Monday11 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- rotate_the_site — is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent 20:21
- seven_five_sweet — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 20:41
- seven_five_sweet — genuine question the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them 20:43
- swirl_not_shake — genuine question came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 20:47
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
🧪11❤️12
reconstituted 5 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
🧪1
genuine question the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
evidence is thin
genuine question came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log