unrelated but the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
#other-peptides 2024-07-20
Saturday17 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- apnoea_down_two — unrelated but the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 09:24
- apnoea_down_two — anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline 12:33
- marrow.mod — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 12:39
- marrow.mod — unrelated but no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past 13:13
- marrow.mod — right so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 13:26
placebo maybe
sceptical but curious
vial-a-2601-front.png
900 × 1200 · 924 KB · not retained in the public archive
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
did nothing for me
verification channel has some
one thing at a time
came back after 9 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
[edited]🧊7⚠️16✅6
TB-500 did nothing for me over 3 weeks and i stand by that a year later
*that should say weekly
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
unrelated but no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
right so i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, anyway