vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-02-09

Sunday24 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • void_volume — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another 20:14
  • void_volume — right so whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 20:27
  • steady_state_sue — PeptideMeter came back 99.2 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 20:45
  • steady_state_sue — came back after 20 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 21:14
  • steady_state_sue — people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this 21:39
VV

purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another

ran it alone

VV

right so whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

FM

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

SS

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

PeptideMeter came back 99.2 on a QYB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

came back after 20 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted

FM

is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it

SS

people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

FM

right so the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 8 months and never came back

anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something

how do people test purity on these, does VendorInvestigate even take them

FM

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser