anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
#other-peptides 2025-03-15
Saturday45 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- spreadsheet_stu — ran TB-500 alone for 10 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, i could be wrong 22:24
- spreadsheet_stu — for the archive VendorInvestigate came back 97.4 on a WWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:26
- ruo_only — unrelated but i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three… 22:37
- see_a_clinician — came back after 22 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence… 23:01
- orfor_watch — does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a CPC BPC lot 23:46
cant tell honestly
ran TB-500 alone for 10 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, i could be wrong
[edited]📈10🧪16
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
for the archive VendorInvestigate came back 97.4 on a WWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
for the archive how do people test purity on these, does Janoshik even take them
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
one thing at a time
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
unrelated but i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
ran one thing at a time for 2 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
verification channel has some
baseline month helped
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
👀2🔥1
sceptical but curious
💀8
stacked, learned nothing
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
injuries heal anyway
sorry to jump in changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
genuine question TB-500 did nothing for me over 6 weeks and i stand by that a year later
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
came back after 22 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
transit-times.csv
254 rows · not retained in the public archive
❤️3🧪11
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, thats just me
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
back after 6 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
*PeptideMeter not the other one
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
while im here oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
evidence is thin
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a CPC BPC lot
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
🔥3