#other-peptides 2025-04-21

the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it

evidence is thin

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, still working it out

reconstituted 5 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with

how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing

verification channel has some

unrelated but PeptideMeter came back 98.6 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, from memory

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s

how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically

cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees

is stacking three things at once ever defensible

one thing at a time

i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all

how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them

rodent data only

no human data

sceptical but curious

placebo maybe

coming back to this TB-500 did nothing for me over 25 weeks and i stand by that a year later

back after 20 months, has any actual data landed on BPC

the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else

while im here nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing