rodent data only
#other-peptides 2025-05-01
Thursday35 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- a1c_lag — back after 13 months, has any actual data landed on BPC 15:55
- tb500_tobias — does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SSA BPC lot if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 16:40
- ghk_gia — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change… 17:03
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
back after 13 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
📉18
verification channel has some
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
while im here my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
😂7
cant tell honestly
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SSA BPC lot
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
reconstituted 5 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
did nothing for me
🧊2🔥1
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
✅9📉5
TB-500 did nothing for me over 16 weeks and i stand by that a year later
👀4🙏1
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
TB-500 did nothing for me over 30 weeks and i stand by that a year later
🧊3
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
unrelated but the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 26 months and never came back
[edited]📉2📈1🙏1
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
placebo maybe
🔥2👀1
slightly off topic but GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
reconstituted 2 in 1.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
stacked, learned nothing
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
ran GHK-Cu for 29 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, thats one data point
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
👍1💀1🧪2
no human data
one thing at a time
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
ran it alone
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
came back after 13 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, from memory
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ok so cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees