rodent data only
#other-peptides 2025-06-07
Saturday45 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- typosquat_tay — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 19:46
- reta_resting_hr — unrelated but Medutest came back 97.4 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 20:00
- nhs_pathway_nell — does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels 21:13
- swab_dry_first — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a… 22:57
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, ill dig out the number
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, happy to be corrected
placebo maybe
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
🧪5
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
ran one thing at a time for 3 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 6.2 degrees, take that with a pinch of salt
unrelated but Medutest came back 97.4 on a GGPeps lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a SGN BPC lot
while im here the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, thats just me
ran it alone
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them, we shall see
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
i stacked three things for 20 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
evidence is thin
one thing at a time
✅1
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
quick one i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
verification channel has some
janoshik-d-0718.pdf
2 pages · 396 KB · not retained in the public archive
stacked, learned nothing
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
📉6👀9
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
✅1
ran GHK-Cu for 22 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 22 months and never came back, happy to be corrected
reconstituted 5 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
get it tested
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
for the archive does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
follow up is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
no human data
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
ran GHK-Cu for 15 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
👍14📈3
did nothing for me
❤️3🙏1🤝1