purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 99.4 on another, happy to be corrected
#other-peptides 2025-07-02
Wednesday35 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- mg_per_ml — GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, for what its worth 17:55
- factory_direct_fi — ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the… 18:42
- madrid_mg — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own… 19:09
- factory_direct_fi — ran GHK-Cu for 5 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ill dig out the number purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my… 19:17
- factory_direct_fi — i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, i have it written down somewhere 19:18
TB-500 did nothing for me over 29 weeks and i stand by that a year later
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
right so oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
cant tell honestly
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
i stacked three things for 7 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
[edited]did nothing for me
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
evidence is thin
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
rodent data only
🧪1📈10❤️2
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, for what its worth
🤝9
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
placebo maybe
ran TB-500 alone for 32 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, anyway
ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
coa-f-1330.pdf
1 page · 662 KB · not retained in the public archive
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, i have it written down somewhere
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
💀12🧪12
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
ran GHK-Cu for 5 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, ill dig out the number
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 97.4 on another
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, i have it written down somewhere
*Medutest not the other one
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
came back after 12 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see