how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
#other-peptides 2025-07-29
Tuesday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- acetate_ash — reconstituted 2 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with 09:04
- first_month_fi — ran GHK-Cu for 20 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 14:28
- taper_tess — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another 16:37
genuine question BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
[edited]anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
ran it alone
reconstituted 2 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
🤝12📈7🙏6
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back, for what its worth
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
get it tested
injuries heal anyway
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a QST BPC lot
update on the earlier thing the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
stacked, learned nothing
ran TB-500 alone for 21 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
📉2⚠️6
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
ran GHK-Cu for 20 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
🙏13🤝7🎉4
i stacked three things for 21 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another
🎉7👀1
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult