vialroom

#other-peptides 2025-08-21

Thursday22 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • amylin_amy — genuine question Janoshik came back 97.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 17:39
  • no_chargeback — anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting 17:54
  • septum_sal — while im here if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 19:15
AA

ran GHK-Cu for 30 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

genuine question Janoshik came back 97.4 on a CPC lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works

SS

tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling

is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones

NC

anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting

⚠️14🙏1🤝12
NC

whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication

one thing at a time

🧊1🧪1

secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening

nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing

AA

coming back to this ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring

is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything

LN

i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve

coming back to this the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult

SS

while im here if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it

9🧪5
LN

no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past

LN

right so took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log