people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
#other-peptides 2025-09-09
Tuesday31 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- nine_nine_one — reconstituted 15 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with 11:38
- maintenance_mo — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 12:26
- maintenance_mo — does anyone have a Janoshik result for a SSA BPC lot 13:14
- nine_nine_one — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 15:37
- nine_nine_one — cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees 15:38
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
ok so whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
[edited]BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
reconstituted 15 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
✅5
get it tested
transit-times.csv
117 rows · not retained in the public archive
ran it alone
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
injuries heal anyway
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
👍3👀18
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
did nothing for me
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
ran GHK-Cu for 22 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a SSA BPC lot
ran TB-500 alone for 3 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
TB-500 did nothing for me over 27 weeks and i stand by that a year later
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
verification channel has some
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
⚠️7🧊3
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees
✅1😂1💀10
i stacked three things for 21 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, still working it out
sorry to jump in tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
slightly off topic but is stacking three things at once ever defensible
[edited]