is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
#other-peptides 2025-09-26
Friday39 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- lisbon_lot — unrelated but ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring 17:49
- lisbon_lot — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, thats one data point 17:50
- typosquat_tay — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log 18:04
- lisbon_lot — does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SWB BPC lot 18:45
- chlorhex — Janoshik came back 98.1 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 20:44
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser, i could be wrong
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 25 months and never came back, your mileage will differ
unrelated but ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
✅11🔥2
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, thats one data point
coa-d-0718.pdf
1 page · 89 KB · not retained in the public archive
verification channel has some
reconstituted 5 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
[edited]📉1🎉1
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
ran it alone
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
🙏7🔥9🤝14
ran GHK-Cu for 16 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind, take that with a pinch of salt
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
came back after 18 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
placebo maybe
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SWB BPC lot
⚠️9🧪1
evidence is thin
[edited]anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
[edited]my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
sceptical but curious
🎉1👍18
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
😂1🧊4
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
⚠️6👍1
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, someone check my working
anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these
how do people test purity on these, does VendorInvestigate even take them
Janoshik came back 98.1 on a SGN lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
no human data
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
one thing at a time
ok so ran TB-500 alone for 2 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened