one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
[edited]#other-peptides 2025-10-04
- bpc_sceptic — is stacking three things at once ever defensible 21:00
- maintenance_mo — my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 21:10
- bpc_sceptic — secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening 21:18
- VialBot — Assay note: BCH lot A-2418 reported at 99.2% of label content. 22:37
slightly off topic but the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
TB-500 did nothing for me over 17 weeks and i stand by that a year later
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
ran it alone
quick one does anyone have a Janoshik result for a CPC BPC lot
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
baseline month helped
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
cant tell honestly
injuries heal anyway
reconstituted 20 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
stacked, learned nothing
genuine question the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
came back after 6 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, ask me again in a month
right so TB-500 did nothing for me over 14 weeks and i stand by that a year later
Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 71 awaiting dispatch.
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
slightly off topic but the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, ill dig out the number
Assay note: BCH lot A-2418 reported at 99.2% of label content.
rodent data only
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
one thing at a time
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
[edited]anyone reconstituted a 40 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
ran TB-500 alone for 22 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened