GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, we shall see
#other-peptides 2025-10-09
Thursday41 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- deamidation — no. it means nobody knows. absence of human evidence is not evidence of absence, it is just absence 19:12
- deamidation — if somebody posts a trial with a journal and a year, read it. if they cannot name one, treat it as anecdote 20:06
- question_queue — understood. seeing a physio first 21:31
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a SWB BPC lot
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
cant tell honestly
stacked, learned nothing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, thats one data point
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
is BPC-157 worth it for a shoulder that has not healed in a year
you are about to get a very split answer
let me do the boring half. the published work on BPC-157 is overwhelmingly rodent and in vitro
tendon, gut and wound models in rats. a lot of positive papers, one research group heavily represented, and essentially no controlled human trials
so it does not work?
no. it means nobody knows. absence of human evidence is not evidence of absence, it is just absence
✅14
i am the anecdote you were asking for. tennis elbow, eight weeks, it went. i also stopped doing the thing that caused it
which is the problem with every one of these stories, including mine
and tendinopathy has a high spontaneous improvement rate over months. that confound is in all of it
is there any human data at all
there are early phase reports and a lot of grey literature. i am not going to hand you a citation because i would be inventing one
if somebody posts a trial with a journal and a year, read it. if they cannot name one, treat it as anecdote
🎯11
that is the standard in here and it is worth saying out loud occasionally
what about TB-500
same shape, thinner. a fragment related to thymosin beta-4, animal and mechanistic work, no human outcome trials worth quoting
people run the two together because that is how the pairing got written up years ago, not because anyone compared them
i have never seen a head to head of anything in this space
you will not. nobody is funding it
and legally?
research use only. not approved for human use anywhere, and we say that because it is true, not to cover ourselves
the people selling it know it too. it is printed on the label
where do people get it
not in here. #vendor-verification, and read the pinned criteria before you ask
✅8
sorry
no need. everyone asks in the wrong channel once
and get whatever you buy tested. Janoshik or Medutest, and the recent ones are all in #test-results
for a compound with no human dose-response, knowing what is in the vial is the only thing you can actually control
that is bleak but fair
and to close your original question out — nobody in here can tell you it will fix your shoulder. we can only tell you the evidence does not
understood. seeing a physio first
🙌10