no human data
#other-peptides 2025-10-20
Monday39 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
📈1🧪10📉11
get it tested
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, still working it out
sorry to jump in i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, we shall see
🧊1🧪9🎉2
injuries heal anyway
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
did nothing for me
reconstituted 20 in 5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
Janoshik came back 96.8 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
sceptical but curious
coming back to this i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
[edited]evidence is thin
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating, ask me again in a month
🧊3
ran it alone
anyone had a purity result under 98.1 on one of these
Channel stats, last 30 days: 107 messages from 33 members.
🧪10
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
cant tell honestly
update on the earlier thing the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 21 months and never came back
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
genuine question anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, thats just me
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
baseline month helped
ran GHK-Cu for 21 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
anyone reconstituted a 10 vial of these to 10 and had it stay clear