if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, ill dig out the number
#other-peptides 2025-10-24
Friday47 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- van_isle_vial — i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 11:36
- no_escrow_nate — sorry to jump in the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the… 12:06
- no_escrow_nate — the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, we shall see 12:07
unrelated but one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, we shall see
verification channel has some
no human data
did nothing for me
🤝15😂6🔥6
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else, for what its worth
get it tested
✅2💀6
sceptical but curious
anyone had a purity result under 99 on one of these
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, we shall see
ran it alone
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
reconstituted 20 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
✅3
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
💀2
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
right so ran TB-500 alone for 8 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
cant tell honestly
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
one thing at a time
van_isle_viali log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard…
sorry to jump in the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
vial-c-4402-front.png
900 × 1200 · 906 KB · not retained in the public archive
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, we shall see
✅14📈11❤️14
injuries heal anyway
ran GHK-Cu for 3 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
Archive lookup: aliquot_ada first appears in this channel on 2025-02-18.
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
✅1👀1🧊4
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 99 on another
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
evidence is thin
🎉11👀12
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
stacked, learned nothing
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
weights-monthly.csv
528 rows · not retained in the public archive
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4 degrees
back after 21 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
🧊1🤝3✅3
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
update on the earlier thing took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
👍1
placebo maybe
baseline month helped
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
rodent data only
Medutest came back 98.1 on a ERP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it