the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
#other-peptides 2025-11-01
- tyne_tracks — VendorInvestigate came back 98.6 on a FGP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:32
- batch_bandit — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 22:55
- pbs_pip — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 23:16
anyone reconstituted a 40 vial of these to 4 and had it stay clear
did nothing for me
ran one thing at a time for 6 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
VendorInvestigate came back 98.6 on a FGP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
verification channel has some
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
while im here i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
injuries heal anyway
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, someone check my working
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
[edited]stacked, learned nothing
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.2 on one lot and 98.1 on another
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
ran GHK-Cu for 19 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
genuine question how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
placebo maybe
ran TB-500 alone for 16 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
no human data
baseline month helped
evidence is thin
i stacked three things for 21 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing, ask me again in a month
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees, still working it out
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
get it tested
one thing at a time
Digest for the week of 2025-03-05 has been published.
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a SGN BPC lot
follow up whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all