ran it alone
#other-peptides 2025-11-18
- pharmac_pen — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 22:45
- protein_floor — oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, thats one data point 23:09
- pharmac_pen — ran TB-500 alone for 5 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened 23:14
sorry to jump in how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
i stacked three things for 12 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
ran GHK-Cu for 23 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
no human data
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a FGP BPC lot
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
Assay note: JEEP lot A-2601 reported at 97.4% of label content.
sorry to jump in is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
genuine question took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
did nothing for me
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same, thats one data point
came back after 26 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
sorry to jump in how do people test purity on these, does Medutest even take them
ran TB-500 alone for 5 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
ok so tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, for what its worth
stacked, learned nothing
placebo maybe
sorry to jump in BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, thats one data point
ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
Reminder set. I will post here in 9 days.
rodent data only
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
anyone reconstituted a 30 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
Janoshik came back 99.2 on a JEEP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works