purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 99 on another, ask me again in a month
🤝1✅11
#other-peptides 2025-12-02
Tuesday38 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- cricket_or_footy — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 99 on another, ask me again in a month 20:19
- verify_or_dont — anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear 20:46
- verify_or_dont — coming back to this anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline 20:52
- luerlok — unrelated but anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these 21:46
injuries heal anyway
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
rodent data only
🎉1❤️9
sorry to jump in is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
🧪12🔥4
coming back to this anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
👀11🙏11
reconstituted 2 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
one thing at a time
😂15
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
no human data
ran it alone
whats the evidence base for tesamorelin outside the licensed indication
follow up TB-500 did nothing for me over 34 weeks and i stand by that a year later, thats one data point
follow up GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, still working it out
update on the earlier thing is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 22 months and never came back
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
get it tested
verification channel has some
unrelated but anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
vial-f-1330-front.png
900 × 1200 · 480 KB · not retained in the public archive
✅1
evidence is thin
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
ran one thing at a time for 9 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
sceptical but curious
📈1🧊6
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
did nothing for me
ran TB-500 alone for 29 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
back after 13 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
cant tell honestly
placebo maybe