secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
#other-peptides 2025-12-18
- warsaw_vial — GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting 13:15
- VialBot — New independent result logged — HJ, lot C-4402, purity 99.4% (VendorInvestigate). 15:08
- seoul_swirl — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 16:18
- blind_submit — tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating 16:32
- seoul_swirl — took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log 20:32
cant tell honestly
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
follow up ran one thing at a time for 5 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
stacked, learned nothing
verification channel has some
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
get it tested
no human data
one thing at a time
reconstituted 40 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, n of 1 obviously
baseline month helped
coming back to this came back after 6 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, i have it written down somewhere
update on the earlier thing tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 99 on another
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
Assay note: SWB lot G-0641 reported at 99% of label content.
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
New independent result logged — HJ, lot C-4402, purity 99.4% (VendorInvestigate).
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
ran TB-500 alone for 28 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
did nothing for me
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
i stacked three things for 1 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
ran it alone
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
rodent data only
evidence is thin
update on the earlier thing TB-500 did nothing for me over 9 weeks and i stand by that a year later
ran GHK-Cu for 16 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 26 months and never came back
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
injuries heal anyway
ok so anyone reconstituted a 40 vial of these to 8 and had it stay clear
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log