i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
#other-peptides 2026-01-08
- apnoea_down_two — changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable 15:56
- thursday_thea — i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve 16:47
- apnoea_down_two — ran GHK-Cu for 5 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind 20:47
injuries heal anyway
cant tell honestly
verification channel has some
how do people test purity on these, does VendorInvestigate even take them
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
ran it alone
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
no human data
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult, your mileage will differ
stacked, learned nothing
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
TB-500 did nothing for me over 31 weeks and i stand by that a year later
anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
did nothing for me
placebo maybe
ran TB-500 alone for 5 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
for the archive is stacking three things at once ever defensible
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support, i could be wrong
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, anyway
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
ok so how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
baseline month helped
slightly off topic but oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting, thats one data point
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 97.4 on another
ran GHK-Cu for 5 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
Medutest came back 99.4 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 3 months and never came back