are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
💀10🤝14🧊15
#other-peptides 2026-01-19
Monday42 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- plus_sixteen — are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway 09:28
- aliquot_ada — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, your mileage will differ 11:08
- ghk_gia — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 99.2 on another 11:44
- VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot D-0718. Nothing logged either way. 16:04
- mag_citrate — is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent 16:07
baseline month helped
evidence is thin
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
verification channel has some
ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
stacked, learned nothing
ran it alone
🎉17🧪1🤝1
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
🙏1
reconstituted 2 in 3ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
one thing at a time
😂4💀5👀1
follow up how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
rodent data only
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on a ERP lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, happy to be corrected
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing, your mileage will differ
🎉17❤️8😂4
ran TB-500 alone for 8 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
does anyone have a Janoshik result for a CPC BPC lot
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 99.2 on another
✅4🙏12⚠️3
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
anyone reconstituted a 15 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
i stacked three things for 26 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
sceptical but curious
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
⚠️3
no human data
cant tell honestly
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
😂12
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
placebo maybe
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time, ymmv
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
Purity check: no report on file for lot D-0718. Nothing logged either way.
🙏12🧊2
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
📈10👍3🧪2
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
📉4
get it tested
follow up cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees