does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
#other-peptides 2026-01-30
- oli_orals — is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent Medutest came back 96.8 on a WXT lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 20:24
- oli_orals — unrelated but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another 20:26
- meniscus_mel — does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a QYB BPC lot 20:45
- VialBot — New independent result logged — GL Biochem, lot B-0329, purity 96.8% (Medutest). 21:20
- blank_run — the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 24 months and never came back, not advice obviously GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out… 21:54
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
Medutest came back 96.8 on a WXT lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
unrelated but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99 on one lot and 98.1 on another
right so cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 7.4 degrees
coming back to this how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
[edited]rodent data only
one thing at a time
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
does anyone have a VendorInvestigate result for a QYB BPC lot
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, i have it written down somewhere
[edited]is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, anyway
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
get it tested
New independent result logged — GL Biochem, lot B-0329, purity 96.8% (Medutest).
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
while im here GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 24 months and never came back, not advice obviously
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
no human data
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
quick one the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
baseline month helped
did nothing for me
ran it alone
cant tell honestly