are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
#other-peptides 2026-03-04
Wednesday37 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- monoisotopic — came back after 16 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted 21:38
- taper_tess — genuine question Medutest came back 99.2 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 21:53
- luerlok — slightly off topic but i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back 22:31
ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
evidence is thin
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, i think
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
TB-500 did nothing for me over 7 weeks and i stand by that a year later, we shall see
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
i stacked three things for 25 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening, ill dig out the number
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
unrelated but does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a Homopeptide BPC lot
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 97.4 on another, ill dig out the number
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
came back after 16 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
🧊15📉10
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
right so nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
genuine question Medutest came back 99.2 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
💀1
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
Purity check: no report on file for lot H-2814. Nothing logged either way.
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
ran GHK-Cu for 4 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 5 months and never came back
unrelated but anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
placebo maybe
slightly off topic but i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
😂6📉18
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
anyone had a purity result under 99 on one of these
no human data
ran it alone
👀9😂5
baseline month helped
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
rodent data only
🎉6
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing, your mileage will differ
stacked, learned nothing